Skip to content

Zorats Qarer (Karahundj) – Armenia’s Stonehenge (7500 years old) – predating England’s Stonehenge (4000 years old)

November 13, 2012

Some people who have no deep knowledge of  Armenian history used to say that it is not right to connect  between the culture that created these monuments and Armenia, that they are part of  our common heritage as human beings and not the property of any nationality. BUT…  Since Armenia has been around since 3500 BC it’s safe to say that these are located in “historic Armenia”.  I can make an analogy to them, that Stonehenge is clearly located in England, but we cannot say it was built by the British – you cannot refute that it is on Ancient British soil, though can you? Ancient tribes in what is now ancient armenian soil had built it, then some obscure transcript states that it may be the same tribe that went on to build Stonehenge.

I often encounter such double standards when it concerns the Armenians. As if they are not allowed to celebrate their ancient heritage, but when for example the British dress up as druids hopping around the Stonehenge, no one bothers telling them that no one even knows what Stonehenge was used for. Sure all modern nations are modern and probably diverge from the ancient once (although genetic research has repeatedly put Armenian population in East Anatolia), that is still no argument against Armenians celebrating their heritage. And yes everything always changes, every molecule constantly moves, today is not yesterday and modern people are not ancient people. But let’s not apply double standards. By that logic we might as well proclaim every heritage of every nation a fiction. Good luck explaining the Greeks they are simply the ‘custodians’ of their Hellenic marvels. Or the French claiming Gaul ancestry.

But you are mistaken about one thing. Armenians actually haven’t moved much throughout the course of their history. Yes they have been subjects to numerous empires for periods but they pretty much populated the same area they live in today. The large scale deportations occurred only after the 1st WW, during the Armenian Genocide. Before Armenians haven’t been moving all that much. Through history they’re known as builders not nomads! In fact there are no records in existence of Armenians living elsewhere than Armenia. As far as human recording goes Armenians emerged in the near east highlands also known as Armenian Highlands.

Armenia contains some of the most significant cultural examples of sacred geometry, as well as other remarkable prehistoric structures, such as the “stonehenge” at Karahundj near Sissian. This stone circle, now shown to be a prehistoric observatory, long predates Stonehenge in England. Ancient inscriptions found here may mark the birthplace of the Zodiac – and of Western Civilisation itself. Rick Ney explores their cultural significance.

More than fifteen years of study has been focused on the stones at Sissian in Armenia, beginning in the 1980’s when archeologists first uncovered mausoleums at the site. Before then, the site wasn’t more than a curiosity, though in the 19th century it was endowed with fertility powers—pictures taken in the 1890’s show women lying prone across stones in an effort to “cure barrenness”.

It should be no surprise to anyone who knows something of Armenia’s history that astronomy is such an important part of the national character. Sun symbols, signs of the zodiac, and ancient calendars predominated in the region while the rest of the world was just coming alive, culturally speaking. Egypt and China were still untamed wilderness areas when the first cosmic symbols began appearing on the side of the Geghama Mountain Range around 7000 BC. At Metsamor (ca 5000 BC), one of the oldest observatories in the world can be found. It sits on the southern edge of the excavated city, a promontory of red volcanic rocks that juts out like the mast of a great ship into the heavens. Between 2800 and 2500 BCE at least three observatory platforms were carved from the rocks. The Metsamor observatory is an open book of ancient astronomy and sacred geometry. For the average visitor the carvings are indecipherable messages. With Elma Parsamian, the first tounlock the secrets of the Metsamor observatory as a guide, the world of the first astronomers comes alive.

“The Metsamorians were a trade culture,” Parsamian explains. “Fortrade, you have to have astronomy, to know how to navigate.” The numerous inscriptions found at Metsamor puzzled excavators, as indecipherable as they were elaborate. Hundreds of small circular bowls were carved on the rock surfaces, connected by thin troughs or indented lines. But one stood out. It is an odd shaped design that was a mystery to the excavators of the site, until Professor Parsamian discovered it was a key component to the large observatory complex. By taking a modern compass and placing it on the carving, Parsamian found that it pointed due North, South and East. It was one of the first compasses used in Ancient times.

Another carving on the platforms shows four stars inside a trapezium. The imaginary end point of a line dissecting the trapezium matches the location of star which gave rise to Egyptian, Babylonian and ancient Armenian religious worship.

Sketch the locations of the Jupiter moons over several nights and you’re repeating an experiment Galileo did in 1610. Chart a star over several years and you repeat an experiment the Metsamorians did almost 5000 years ago. By using the trapezium carving and a 5000 year stellar calendar, Parsamian discovered that the primary star which matched the coordinates of its end point was the star Sirius, the brightest star in our galaxy.
“Sirius is most probably the star worshipped by the ancient inhabitants of Metsamor,” Parsamian explains. “Between 2800-2600 BCE Sirius could have been observed from Metsamor in the rising rays of the sun. It is possible that, like the ancient Egyptians, the inhabitants of Metsamor related the first appearance of Sirius with the opening of the year.”
Those wanting to plot the same event from Metsamor will have to wait a while. Sirius now appears in the winter sky, while the inhabitants of Metsamor observed it in the summer. (Because of the earth’s rotation within the rotation of the Milky Way galaxy, stars change their positions over time. In another 4000 years or so Sirius will again appear as it is plotted on the Metsamor stellar map).

The Metsamorians also left behind a calendar divided into twelve months, and made allowances for the leap year. Like the Egyptian calendar which had 365 days, every four years the Metsamorians had to shift Sirius’ rising from one day of the month to the next.

The stones were a particular kind of telescopic instrument. She noted that stones on the Western side of the complex held “antsk” (eye-holes), and that they all pointed to the horizon. “Those eye-holes were pointing exactly at the horizon,” Parsamian says, “they looked at specific points in the night sky in different directions.” While excavators spent their days at the site, Parsamian and her assistants worked in the night and at dawn. What they found was astonishing. “From these holes you can watch lunar phases and the sunrise at the solstice.”

Coming on the heels of a remarkable discovery at Metsamor, the stones at Sissian confirmed original hypothesis—ancestral Armenians were indeed navigators, they had an intimate understanding of the stars, how to plot latitude and longitude, even how to divide time.

It was clear that the site was used to watch the night sky and solar positions, and it seemed the stones were from a different era than that of the burial ground. Other archeologists agreed, but lacking carbon dating or other methods of determining the age of the stones, they were unable to agree on a specific date, and so the site was ascribed as 3rd millennium BC.

Parsamian published her findings beginning in 1984, and shared her discovery with others, one of whom was Paris Herouni, the director of the Radio Physics Measurement Institute and the designer of the first optical radio telescope in the world, located just above Byurakan on Aragats mountain. Herouni, an avid fan of Parsamian’s pioneering work, was fascinated with her findings. Believing that her pioneering work at Metsamor and Sissian not only shattered previous conceptions about when ancestral Armenians developed their culture, but that it also pointed to a source of civilization itself on the Armenian Plateau, Herouni began to study her work carefully, as well as that by Gerald Hawkins regarding Europe’s henges.

Using Parsamian’s original findings, Herouni organized four expeditions to the site between 1994 and 1996, each during an equinox or solstice. He and his assistants brought chronometers, telescopes and other astronomical equipment to test the accuracy of the stones.

“We even took a helicopter and flew over the sight to accurately plot the area,” Herouni says with a laugh. “I had cartographers and photographers all over the site, we marked and catalogued the stones, took measurements – it was Herouni and his team soon verified Parsamian’s findings: the stones were indeed an astronomical instrument, and it is still very accurate. Holding a topographical map of the site, Herouni points out the site’s features, “Inside the complex there are 204 main stones. All of them are made of basalt. They rise between a half a meter to 3 meters tall, their bases are up to one and a half meters wide, and they weigh up to ten tons each. Of these main stones, 76 have apertures, 63 are stable, 16 declining, and 90 lying on their sides. 45 are damaged, especially the apertures.” Herouni thinks the damage was caused by invading armies and early Christians trying to destroy the pagan worship site.

A bird’s-eye view of the site is impressive. The complex is centered around 39 stones in the configuration of an egg, with its main axis lying East to West. “From East to West, this ‘egg’ stretches 43 meters,” Herouni adds, “37 meters from North to South.” Dissecting this central form is an arc of twenty stones that bends to the West, “forming an inner elliptical shape, a ‘Khorda’.” The excavated graves lie inside the khorda, which led archeologists to originally think the stones were placed there about the same time.

Three alleys of stones lie off the central shape, looking like arms reaching to the North, South and Southeast. The alleys are two to ten meters wide, with additional stones lying in their path. These “arms” are important, since the stones with apertures in them lie only on the alleys. Herouni is sure the site is as Parsamian said, an astronomical instrument. And he is also sure the site was used to plot sunrises, moon phases, and he adds, “the beginning of a calendar”.

The North and South arms bend at the end to the West. “The North alley is 172 meters long, turning West for another 40 meters. It holds 71 main stones, 43 with apertures. The South alley stretches 160 meters, turning west for 40 meters. It holds 69 main stones, 27 with apertures. The one going southeast stretches 20 meters, with three main stones inside the alley.”

Though the exteriors of the stones are rough and lichen covered, the holes are still polished and finely cut, measuring between 5-7 cm in diameter. And these apertures are the key to the entire site. They are actually very accurate telescopes that point to sunrises and sunsets at specific times of the year. Lying only in stones on the arms of the complex, each points to a different point on the horizon.

Each one was measured and looked for clues of how they might have been used. “The eye-holes measure 7 to ten centimeters diameter at the surface, then funnel down to 5 centimeters in diameter before opening up again on the other side. The stones themselves resemble animal shapes, but they are rough cut, nothing looks refined or interesting. But every one of the apertures are polished on the inside.

Herouni sketches out a schematic of England’s Stonehenge, pointing to two inner circles inside the mammoth stones most people think as the monument itself. “Those huge ‘doors’ that everyone thinks is Stonehenge are nothing without these smaller stones in the middle,” Herouni says as he points to a circle of lower stones on his drawing. “These are the sight-stones for the complex. You stood behind them, then you placed a pole in one of these holes in the ground between them and the door ways. That’s the only way you could spot something in the sky. There are many of these stones and holes, so Hawkins thinks the astronomers rotated around the circle to keep up with the moving sun and moon.”

The stones at Sissian are completely different. “Of all the henges discovered, none have apertures. None. And the apertures are so cleanly cut, they pinpoint very small spots in the sky. At Stonehenge your field of vision is much larger, the door ways are about 70 centimeters wide. But at Sissian, they are only 5 centimeters diameter. You can pinpoint a spot within a spot. It is extremely accurate. Even more so when you think they might have made cornices from clay or wood and placed them inside the apertures. It would have made the telescopes amazingly accurate for that time. Even for today.”

To plot the sky, you have to have an idea of time. These stones—many of which look to the azimuths, were used at specific times of the year to chart solar and lunar phases. Those with eye-holes point exactly to the point where they occur at exact times of the year. What astonished all of us during our expedition was just how correct they still are.”

Unlike star positions, the sun and moon continue to cross azimuths in the same position in the night sky. So key stones emerged as reliable predictors of their phases.

“This would be crucial to the ancient cultures,” Parsamian said about the observatory at Metsamor. “The ancients had to know when the new year began, the exact moment. At Metsamor they could observe Sirius appearing in the rays of the dawning sun. That was the cosmic event they looked for, the one they staked their reputations as priests by predicting. This was complicated stuff.”

And those that didn’t have holes, what were they for? “They were all part of the same instrument,” Herouni says. “Eye holes were not enough without other points to fix the angle of the sight. So we have stones to look through, and others close by that were used to line up the stone, to establish the angle of sight.”

“There is one stone, which can be called the keystone to the whole complex, it has a bowl carved on one side. At first I looked at that bowl and thought, ‘What on earth could this be?’ Then it rained one evening, and the next day the bowl was filled with water, and I thought, ‘Of course! This is a levelling stone!'”

By pouring water into the bowl, Herouni believes the ancients could set the angle of the keystone, thereby setting the other stones into position. An ingenious method at the time. “You can’t tell me these people were simple,” Herouni challenges. “They understood geometry and the laws of physics long before anyone in Europe began to look into the matter. This was an incredible culture.”

Herouni points out three stones (#60, 62, 63 in diagram) which form part of a single instrument, “a beautiful and important instrument,” he adds. “So many of these stones look like animals or people. #60 we called the cock, or rooster, because of its shape. One tip is higher than the other, and was a sighting point for #62, which has an eye-hole that looks right over its tip. Then there is #63, which has an eye-hole that also looks at the tip of the rooster, but at a different angle. It was the levelling stone for the first two.”

“The latitude at Sissian is 40°”, Herouni says. “From there the position of the sun at midday on the summer solstice is 50°. The eye-hole in stone #62 is angled at 50°, just over the tip of the rooster stone (#60). But the angle of the eye-hole in stone #63 (the levelling stone) is 40°, that is, the same angle as the latitude at Sissian. These were the stones we used to watch the summer solstice. We had our telescopes, our instruments hooked up at the same angle, but the stones were still so accurate we wondered why we needed all these expensive tools. The stones were so elegantly correct.”

Other stones mark the sun at its zenith at the equinox. “March 21 is the beginning of Spring. We all know that. March 21 was also the beginning of the New Year in the Old Armenian Calendar. These stones were crucial to marking the start of the year.” Herouni adds that holes also point to constellations in the night sky, and that the site was also a university.

“Stones #160 and #161 (shown in the image) are what I call the university. # 160 looks West to a low hill, and is positioned for an adult to look through it. Right next to it lies stone # 161, which looks at the same point, but is much lower. It is ideal for a child to use. I believe it was used to teach the next generation how to use the complex.”
The Zodiac

The one thing Parsamian needed to better date the site was a key inscription or design like the compass and trapezium she found at Metsamor. If she had found that, she could have begun her calculations based on a stellar calendar. But she could not find the key to unlock this final mystery, and so returned to her work at Metsamor and as an astrophysicist at Byurakan.

Herouni believes he has found the key, and using the same method Parsamian used to date the observatory at Metsamor, is conjecturing that the stones are so much older than the excavated graves, it will “shake everyone’s theories about when astronomy began.”

To put Herouni’s theory into perspective, it is important to understand what the classical history of the beginning of astronomy was. That history officially begins around 3500 BC, when Mesopotamians were thought to have built ziggurats (stepped towers resembling a pyramid) in Sumeria, in order to study the night sky. It continues to ca. 2800 BC, when historians thought the division of the firmament into constellations was completed, creating the Zodiac.

It concludes with the first Babylonian Empire (ca. 2400-1800 BC), where historians say the first astronomy really began, as well as the first calendar, a counting system based on 60 (the beginning of time division), and the first navigation. In some histories the whole thing occurred during the Babylonian empire period.

By the time Parsamian had first published her findings in Metsamor, this history had already been challenged with excavations showing zodiac signs much older than anyone had seen before, in Anatolia and the Armenian Plateau..
Astronomy without Telescopes?

A startling report done in 1988, which challenged previous thoughts about where the Indo-European language came from, fed the fire, and as more and more excavations and studies came forward, it has now become more widely accepted that both the Indo-Europeans and the Zodiac were not the domain of the Babylonians and the end of the 3rd millennium, they were the domain of the peoples living in Anatolia and on the Armenian Plateau.

Parsamian points to several studies suggesting the source of the Zodiac came from the Armenian plateau. And she points to no less a person than the most famous investigator of stone observatories in the world, Gerald Hawkins, who wrote to Victor Hambartsumian saying he believed that stone henges in the West are not unique, and that the same monuments can be found in Armenia.

“Maunder and Olkott were the first to put the zodiac in our part of the world,” Parsamian adds. “Both of them—and this is in the early part of our century—wrote that the zodiac constellations were created in Eastern Anatolia and Armenia.

E. Maunder and W. Olkott, respected astronomers and archeologists, based their theory around the designs of the constellations—just what animals were chosen to represent the constellations, and where did they come from—to lead to where they originated.

“There are millions of stars,” Parsamian says, “you could have made any design you wanted. Maunder and Olkott asked, ‘why these animals?’, knowing they would lead them to the place the zodiac creators lived.”

Astronomical facts correspond with historical and archeological investigations and prove that people who have invented the ancient figures of the constellations probably lived in the valley of the Euphrates, as well as in the region near the mountain Ararat.
While Maunder, in his Astronomy Without Telescopes (London 1906), wrote:
People, who divided the sky into constellations, most probably lived between 36 and 42 degrees of the northern latitude, so neither Egypt nor Babylon could be the motherland of creation of constellations. Calculating in what place the center of this empty region coincides with the North Pole, we got he figure 2800 BC, which is probably the date during which the naming of the constellations were completed. It was observed that such animals such as the elephant, camel, hippopotamus, crocodile and tiger were not amongst the figures representing the constellations, therefore we can assert that India, Arabia and Egypt could not have been the place where the idea of the firmament originated.

We can exclude Greece, Italy and Spain on the basis of the fact that the figure of the tiger is presented in the figures of the constellations. Thus, purely by logical thinking we can assert that the motherland of the celestial figures must be in Asia Minor and Armenia, that is to say a region limited by the Black, the Mediterranean, the Caspian and the Aegean Seas.
Parsamian’s discovery at Metsamor, and the stones at Sissian give concrete credence to Maunder’s and Olkott’s theories, especially when coupled with ca. 4000–3000 BC stone carvings of zodiac figures on rocks on the Geghama Mountain Range in Armenia.

Now Herouni steps into the fray, armed with calculations and methodology borrowed directly from Parsamian’s study at Metsamor.

As Herouni and his team catalogued the stones, they found one that was different from the rest. Herouni believes it is the key stone Parsamian was looking for. “All the stones with apertures point to the horizon or lunar positions in the night sky”, he says. “All, that is, but one”.

While other sight-holes pointed to the horizon, this one had an aperture that bent in the center and pointed directly up. You couldn’t see anything looking through that aperture, but if you put something shiny at the bend, something like a polished metal or obsidian, you could look through the hole to a zenith point straight above you. It was a periscope.”

Herouni excitedly began to make calculations from this unique stone. Figuring the ancients looked at specific star or constellation through the periscope, he knew he had the key Parsamian was looking for to be able to date the site.

“The chances of something like that occurring are very small,” Herouni said. “Mathematically I was certain it would lead to one star or group of stars in the sky, and then we would have our date.”

Herouni was able to discount the sun or moon, since they do not cross the zenith point above the stone at that latitude. At the same time, because of the tilting axis of the earth as it rotates around the sun, the stars change their apparent position in the night sky, something Herouni calls a “delivered rotation to the elliptical plane by 23 degrees, with a conical precision of 26,000 years,” he knew that what appeared at the zenith could only be a star or stars. Figuring that even with a polished object as a reflective mirror, the ancients would not have been able to observe any distant stars, Herouni chose to study the brightest stars in the North sky for his calculations.

Using the same method Parsamian had published in her study on Metsamor, Herouni took the latitude of the site, five of the brightest stars in the North sky, and compared them with a stellar calendar showing the stars ascendant in Sissian region during different epochs of time.

“The probability of one of these stars crossing the zenith at that point was very low. I expected to find at most one star, or one group of stars.”

What shocked Herouni when he completed his calculations was that he found not one star at the zenith above the stone, he found two. “The star calendar showed there was a 100% probability of the stone pointing to two stars,” Herouni said, “each at different times. The chances of it actually pointing to two stars is infinitesimal.”

The two stars are Arktur and Capella.

“The interesting thing is that Arktur was ascendant at the time the old or “main” style Armenian calendar began (2492 BCE). Now this would make the site a few hundred years younger than that at Metsamor, but I believed it had to be older, for several reasons, not the least of which is that by the time of Metsamor, the astronomers were already drawing star positions and geometric figures on stone. It looks like they were mapping the night sky on their observatory site. But we have found no inscriptions at the Sissian site. There had to be advancements in the culture to reach Metsamor’s sophisticated level.”

Another reason is that Herouni made a further calculation: The calendar Herouni refers to is not a first calendar, it is a calendar change.

“I refer to King Haik, who many think was a legend. By my studies, and through archeological finds, his name appears in historical chronicles of that time, looking very much to me like he was an actual person.”

Haik is connected to the Babylonian King Nemruth (Nemrod), who is connected in the bible with the tower of Babel. Armenian legend calls Nemruth “Bel”, but retains the story of Babel. In that legend, Haik is supposed to have participated in the construction of the tower, but when it fell he left Babylon, taking his people to the North. Herouni points to a Babylonian clay tablet where Nemruth wrote to Haik, asking him to return.

In the legend Haik refuses, and Nemruth sent an army to punish him. Haik’s army, skilled archers, are said to have slain the army, Haik’s arrow piercing Nemruth’s armour. Haik took Nemruth’s body to his capital near Lake Van, where he hung him from his tower, a warning to anyone who doubted his own strength.

Nemruth’s death is mentioned on actual Babylonian border stones at the site where the battle is said to have taken place. Those stones and the clay tablet letter to Haik convinces Herouni that the legendary Haik was in fact an historical person.

“And this part is not legend. Haik changed the old Armenian calendar to celebrate his victory, by changing the names of the months to the names of his sons and daughters. He had ten children, so two of the months kept their original names.”

1763_320kara2akara2bkara3bkara3akara3c

Unlike other calendars, the Armenian calendar is a solar calendar. While the Egyptian calendar is also based on 12 months and 30 days, the Armenian calendar includes 7 days in a week, and each day of the month has its name.

“Egypt and Babylon used a moon calendar first,” Herouni says. “Or some combination. The Jewish calendar is a combination of sun and moon calendar, it is very complicated. Armenia never had a moon calendar, they knew about solar positions, eclipses. They came up with a 365 day calendar, that had to be corrected every four years.”

And so to Herouni, the changing of the old to the “main style” calendar, which occurred in 2492 BC, is a second key to the dating of the site at Sissian. “They had a calendar already, because Haik changed it. And he changed it at the time Arktur was ascendant above Armenia.”

“And so I asked myself, ‘how long does it take to create a calendar? How long does it take to understand the concept of time, to divide it into units? And then how long does it take to go further, to understand latitude and longitude, to develop navigation?’ The entire ancient world was navigating by the time Arktur was ascendant—they already had calendars, they understood longitude and latitude.”

Herouni calculates it would have taken many years—perhaps thousands—to create the system necessary to begin a calendar and develop the kind of astronomy the people at Sissian used to build the telescopes. “And so, I chose the earlier star, Capella, which was ascendant around 4200 BCE.”

If true, it indeed shatters most histories on the beginning of astronomy. It also coincides with the earliest zodiac designs in Armenia, which appeared at the beginning of the 4th millennium BC.

According to Rick Ney’s article

Advertisements

From → Uncategorized

8 Comments
  1. very interesting, why can’t post on FB?

  2. Hi, for all time i used to check website posts here in the early hours in the break of day, since i love to learn more and
    more.

    • Your style is so unique compared to other people I have read stuff from.

      Thank you for posting when you’ve got the opportunity, Guess I will
      just bookmark this blog.

    • Awesome! Its really amazing paragraph, I have
      got much clear idea concerning from this piece of writing.

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Karahundj – Armenia’s Stonehenge (7500 years old) – predating England’s Stonehenge (4000 years old) « narinnamkn

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: